Ban reason:Self Antag:Spilling all the jugs of meds after security took their contraband. Banned indefinetly due to a history of offenses. Length of ban:Indefinite - Appeal Only Ban Issue: The ban is fair, but I would like a second chance or reduction
Vote Opt-Out:true
Events leading to the ban
Security preformed a department sweep on Medical following a false bomb threat.
Chemist Jared Moore refused a strip search, was found in possession of Combat Gloves.
Chemist Jared Moore threw a fit, after returning from Security, threw all the medicine onto the floor.
Chemist was beaten to death and round proceeded normally.
Reason the ban should be removed
I believe Security violated Space Law and/or etiquette by preforming a departmental sweep on Medical without proper authorization or proper reasonable articulable suspicion. (Code Blue was called ~20 minutes prior to incident, supposed âbomb threatâ was never verified or found.)
I do not have a history of offenses as the above suggests. Pretty much everyone who plays has a history of offenses.
I have ~2.6k hours in Space Station, averaging to about a thousand shifts, with roughly a dozen reports on things such as power-gaming and minor âself-antagâ incidents. I believe this is indicative that i generally do not have a problem with self antagonism or breaking the rules. I do not believe this was a case of âself-antagonismâ, I believed i had the right as Chemist to abuse them.
This is the 2nd appeal for this incident, i retracted the first appeal and re-appealed under a more concise description of events and Vote Opt-Out in an attempt to get this processed.
I read the note that Nikthechampion left, and i am happy that my report (regardless of the part i played) will be used in determining or underlining future behavior and protocol.
The problem I see here is that you have had far more chances than the average user.
The vast majority of players never receive a ban. Many never receive a note. You have five bans and sixteen notes. Even with the 865 hours you have logged on wizden, you are a statistical outlier. I would expect a player with this many hours to not have any issues following the rules. You have had consistent issues with the rules dating back the whole time youâve played.
With this in mind, itâs hard to justify appealing this ban for a âsecondâ chance. Especially if you continue to assert that security searching a department for bombs after a bomb threat under blue alert is a massive overreach of power and that you have a âright to abuse themâ.
The description of events as I see them based on your summary is that you were arrested for being intentionally obstructive, had contraband taken away, and then you proceeded to throw a temper tantrum. And you believe this is not a problem? You believe this is gameplay that is positive?
I want to give you another opportunity to explain the chain of events, as well as whether or not you believe you acted appropriately. Perhaps I misread, or perhaps you didnât convey what you intended to.