Nini - segway

Ban reason: Self-antag / Riot participation
Length of ban: 5,760 minutes
Events leading to the ban: I just joined, sec was open, I walk in and I took segway, they arrested me, put me to perma, i was banned. Im realy was banned because fucking segway. Admin wrote to me that there were some riots, I didn’t even know about it because I had just joined the server. All I did was take a Segway
Reason the ban should be removed: this ban is a joke

image (3).png



After reviewing the round, I’ve decided to deny this appeal. While the Riot Participation accusation is unsubstantiated, making yourself a pain to deal with for security is self-antagging, and for this reason, the ban is within guidelines. Please remember that every other player in the round is trying to enjoy the game, not just you. Keep this in mind when interacting with crew and security as a non-antag.

To enable speedy review of all appeals, appeals that meet certain requirements may bypass the standard, often lengthy, review process. Our banning policy requires appeals which are denied using the speedy review process have this notice placed on them. Any of the following criteria typically make an appeal eligible for the speedy review process:

  • the ban length is less than or equal to 14 days,
  • the appeal is older than 7 days, or
  • the result of the appeal is obvious.

In some cases, the banning admin may process the appeal. The banning admin cannot process the appeal if:

  • the facts that led to the ban are disputed,
  • the appeal makes a claim that the admin who placed it was biased, or
  • the ban was not within the ban guidelines.

You may contact a head game admin if you believe this appeal was handled improperly, but should be aware that this will typically only result in a review of the processing of the appeal itself, with the appeal being re-opened if an issue is found. An appeal is considered to have been processed improperly if the criteria to use the speedy review process was not met, or if the facts which the processing admin relied on to process the appeal were incorrect. You must concisely describe why you believe the appeal was handled improperly. If no issue is found with the processing of the appeal, the appeal itself will not be re-reviewed. If, in bad faith, you claim that an appeal was handled improperly, the reviewing head admin may decide to extend the time you must wait before you appeal and/or extend your ban duration. You can find a full list of staff, including head game admins at the staff directory.

From Rejected to Ban Appeals