58lar85 banned for "saying retard"

[58lar85]

Ban reason: “In a previous round, you used the term ‘Retard’. You have been warned for this exact issue previously. We consider it to be a slur, and using slurs is against the rules.” 
Length of ban: 4320 minutes
Events leading to the ban: i dont know i didnt play ss14 yesterday or today
Reason the ban should be removed: the ban reason is exactly the same as i had in the past and i didnt play ss14 at all for about 2 days by now and i dont remember saying the r slur after i got banned for rdm

[58lar85]

i remember that i had a lesson at the approximate time that i was “banned” 

[spaceylady]

I have reviewed the appeal and decided to deny it this time based on the fact you have already been warned for this same rule break very recently and your ban ends on the 9th of December.

This is in line with our speedy appeal process which allows me to deny this if the ban is less than 14 days long and I believe it is fair according to what happened.

I have found clear evidence through logs as seen that you did in fact say it on December 4th which is after your previous warning given on the 25th of November.

Slurs are clearly against our rules and we take them very seriously, please familiarise yourself with our rules before you rejoin.

[Chief_Engineer]

To enable speedy review of all appeals, appeals that meet certain requirements may bypass the standard, often lengthy, review process. Our banning policy requires appeals which are denied using the speedy review process have this notice placed on them. Any of the following criteria typically make an appeal eligible for the speedy review process:

• the ban length is less than or equal to 14 days,
• the appeal is older than 7 days, or
• the result of the appeal is obvious.

In some cases, the banning admin may process the appeal. The banning admin cannot process the appeal if:

• the facts that led to the ban are disputed,
• the appeal makes a claim that the admin who placed it was biased, or
• the ban was not within the ban guidelines.

You may contact a head game admin if you believe this appeal was handled improperly, but should be aware that this will typically only result in a review of the processing of the appeal itself, with the appeal being re-opened if an issue is found. An appeal is considered to have been processed improperly if the criteria to use the speedy review process was not met, or if the facts which the processing admin relied on to process the appeal were incorrect. You must concisely describe why you believe the appeal was handled improperly. If no issue is found with the processing of the appeal, the appeal itself will not be re-reviewed. If, in bad faith, you claim that an appeal was handled improperly, the reviewing head admin may decide to extend the time you must wait before you appeal and/or extend your ban duration. You can find a full list of staff, including head game admins at the staff directory.