Ban reason: Banned for selfantaging and having department in username
Length of ban: 3 days
Events leading to the ban: Alright, so this round I started off as a boxer decided to also become a jani in order to help out with cleaning but also box people some scoff (mothman) comes into boxing room steals items (gloves clothes) I ask for it back they refuse I attack they load a mag into me and leave me while I get taken to med by somebody else I come back and continue being boxer jani and when I see moth man he comes in and steals more stuff (our meds and more clothes) I’m now pissed and attack he manages to arrest me and I’m sent to jail I’m not too happy I get out and continue boxing now later in the round I find him dead with a shit tonne of potion damage I take him to med along side cap becuase im kind I heal him up and cuff him with make shift cuffs I take him up to the disposals above jani and sit there with him I only take my previously taken belongings off him and dont take anything else he never once asks to leaves and sits there he then gets out and instantly kills me begins to try and gib me but then stops and throws me in disposals which I’m left in no atempt to arrest me I would like to add during this there was a purge on scoffs by revs so I saved him by hiding him in there and I never once harmed him and during the round ending I rolled hos and was banned shortly a few seconds into the round leaving the round without a qm who suicided and i
Over reason i had the name: jamie cargio and was one of the reasons i was banned i only had this name because its the one ive had on this character for ages i was told a few times when i had the name jamie security and previously cargo man and i changed those straight after i was told to i had no intention of using the name for malicious intent and I know somebody with the name ellison cartgio who I took inspiration from instead of the department I do admit it was pretty silly of me to have that name but I didn’t know it was ban worthy
Reason the ban should be removed: I believe the ban was unnecessary compared to what was did I do admit kidnapping was a bit of self antaging and silliness but I never intended to get any malicious intent it was only in backfire of there previous self antag on me and I also believe they never received any punishment compared to me. I also believe being banned over the name I’ve had for a month and haven’t had any trouble with shouldn’t have resulted in this I’m not one to complain but I believe this ban was pretty stupid for its reasoning I’d understand a day ban but I think 3 days is over stepping it a bit as I never had any malicious intent to ruin anything apart from slow down somebody’s game for about like 3 mins before I let them out good bye :).
After reviewing the round, I’ve decided to deny this appeal. You escalated the situation rather quickly in the boxing ring, hitting the security officer with a crowbar. From what I could gather and from your explanation, they took some clothes/gloves from the boxing ring (they were actively using the gloves to box in the ring) and you told them to put them back. They walked out of the ring after being asked to, but didn’t run off with the equipment; rather staying in the audience and hanging out. You then press the matter, and after being ignored, you crowbar them a bunch, making them pull out their pistol and shoot you with rubber rounds. Pun-Pun decides to down you for some reason, and so you are taken to med. You end up focusing really hard on the fact that they stole from you and end up attempting to get ‘justice served’ by hanging at security’s door and staring into their souls a few times during the round. From what I saw, there were multiple exchanges between you and the security player that round where you keep yelling that they stole from you, instead of attempting to get help from another officer. Ensues a few more exchanges where one of you steals from the other, ultimately ending up with you kidnapping the officer, them asking bystanders to call security, and them getting their cuffs off, critting you and leaving you dead in a bin.
As for the name, you have been contacted four times already by our admins concerning your character names, all of which were within the span of two months. I trust you will be more careful in the future, and we’ll be glad to have you back once your short ban is over.
To enable speedy review of all appeals, appeals that meet certain requirements may bypass the standard, often lengthy, review process. Our banning policy requires appeals which are denied using the speedy review process have this notice placed on them. Any of the following criteria typically make an appeal eligible for the speedy review process:
the ban length is less than or equal to 14 days,
the appeal is older than 7 days, or
the result of the appeal is obvious.
In some cases, the banning admin may process the appeal. The banning admin cannot process the appeal if:
the facts that led to the ban are disputed,
the appeal makes a claim that the admin who placed it was biased, or
the ban was not within the ban guidelines.
You may contact a head game admin if you believe this appeal was handled improperly, but should be aware that this will typically only result in a review of the processing of the appeal itself, with the appeal being re-opened if an issue is found. An appeal is considered to have been processed improperly if the criteria to use the speedy review process was not met, or if the facts which the processing admin relied on to process the appeal were incorrect. You must concisely describe why you believe the appeal was handled improperly. If no issue is found with the processing of the appeal, the appeal itself will not be re-reviewed. If, in bad faith, you claim that an appeal was handled improperly, the reviewing head admin may decide to extend the time you must wait before you appeal and/or extend your ban duration. You can find a full list of staff, including head game admins at the staff directory.