Ban For Dumping Cargo Budged All But 2K

Ban reason: During Salamander Round 46590 you after being told to do your job and not hinder the science progess on threat of demotation, dediced to waste all but 2K of cargo funds and quit, making two departmens lives hell simply because one would not give you what you wanted
Length of ban: 720 minute ban acompanied with one week roleban from cargo/salvage
Events leading to the ban: so i was making money, had 50K budged, collected some mats while hunting for carp bounty, i had one bounty “anomaly core” from start of the shift, and science was asking for “uranium” and refusing to give me the bounty after an hour or half (not sure how long its been) i gived them plasma and artifact, then refused to give further materials (uranium) untill they give me the bounty i was waiting from start of the shift, HOP comed over and her first interraction with me was refusing to acknowledge my point and threating me with my job, i pissed off and dediced to spend all but 2K (because thats the budged station starts with) and retire
Reason the ban should be removed: i do understand what i done was not even remotely okay, and i will promise i won t do same next time i ecounter similar think, i was just trying to solve it in IC and tough its not a big deal since there was 3 more bounty was coming up soon from botany (each was 10K) and cargo had plenty of mats to sustain station for at least next half hour if nothink major will happen, i refuse the part “making two departments lives hell” cargo was only me, and only scientist was already cyrod himself out of frustration after complaining about RD doing nothink, i simply didin t wanted to give science more mats since they unable to do most basic function and keep spending cargo budged/mats, i am sorry i will not repeat same mistake, plase remove my job and 12 hour ban.

my account username is “Namik”, forgor to add it to post tittle sorry for that


On reviewing the bans, it looks like the ban has finished now so I’ll not touch that one.
With regards to the role ban on reviewing this it is in line with our banning policy and is explicitly mentioned in our department specific rules under cargo:

The length is also in line with our banning policy for this.

With this in mind, there is only a few days left on the role ban and is appropriate to finish out its term.
Appeal denied.

To enable speedy review of all appeals, appeals that meet certain requirements may bypass the standard, often lengthy, review process. Our banning policy requires appeals which are denied using the speedy review process have this notice placed on them. Any of the following criteria typically make an appeal eligible for the speedy review process:

  • the ban length is less than or equal to 14 days,
  • the appeal is older than 7 days, or
  • the result of the appeal is obvious.

In some cases, the banning admin may process the appeal. The banning admin cannot process the appeal if:

  • the facts that led to the ban are disputed,
  • the appeal makes a claim that the admin who placed it was biased, or
  • the ban was not within the ban guidelines.

You may contact a head game admin if you believe this appeal was handled improperly, but should be aware that this will typically only result in a review of the processing of the appeal itself, with the appeal being re-opened if an issue is found. An appeal is considered to have been processed improperly if the criteria to use the speedy review process was not met, or if the facts which the processing admin relied on to process the appeal were incorrect. You must concisely describe why you believe the appeal was handled improperly. If no issue is found with the processing of the appeal, the appeal itself will not be re-reviewed. If, in bad faith, you claim that an appeal was handled improperly, the reviewing head admin may decide to extend the time you must wait before you appeal and/or extend your ban duration. You can find a full list of staff, including head game admins at the staff directory.

From Rejected to Ban Appeals