Clowns - "Cooperating with an antagonist to kill captain"

Ban Reason - “Cooperating with an antagonist and conspiring to help them kill the captain, working alongside another head. While also standing in defense of their actions, making announcments in hope of pardoning them”

length of ban - 720 minutes

Events leading to the ban- I spent 55 minutes in hop room just waiting for people to and see their request, someone from space came to bridge and I was confused and then QM came in and started talking to them so I went back to hop room, I went back to bridge QM and guy were still talking and then I raido’d captain if I could go ssd and elect a new hop and the guy said something about “you can call cap” then I told him i just wanted to get a new hop so i could get off, and then I went to go find cap and bring him back to bridge and then the syndicate started killing them out of nowhere this guy wasn’t even wanted also. so I called security saying captain was being killed by the guy.

Reason the ban should be removed - it says “working alongside another head” although I think i spoke to QM twice for like two sentences and I don’t even know who qm was we barely if ever saw each other than the time in bridge, also it says “While also standing in defense of their actions”  I never defended the syndicates I didn’t help them kill cap I even called sec on them to come help get the captain. and it says " making announcments in hope of pardoning them" I haven’t made a single announcment that game other than making the alert go red and saying cap was dead I never made an announcement pardoning them I don’t even know where they got this.

Screenshot 2024-03-14 155823.png

It doesn’t mention it but also a roleban 

I’m going to process this as a roleban appeal since the game ban has already expired.

In the future, please post game ban and roleban appeals separately.

This has been put to an admin discussion and vote of which we have come to the consensus to accept the appeal.

The reasons provided in the discussion for this decision were the following:

  • On review of the replay it does not appear you intended to cooperate with an antagonist. You also did not call for a pardon of the captain, or attempt to defend the antagonist.
  • It was however noted, that this may have been avoided by calling security to remove someone who should not have been in the bridge initially.

Appeal Accepted

From Accepted to Ban Appeals