Dude_Gaming - Rolebanned from centcom; command roles - "Giving crew AA 'because they asked', Inappropriate & OOC announcements on the communications console

Username: Dude_Gaming

Banned Roles: All command roles

Ban reason: Rolebanned from centcom; command roles - "Giving crew AA 'because they asked', Inappropriate & OOC announcements on the communications console
Length of ban: Indefinite
Ban Issue:
I did what I was banned for, but the ban is unreasonably harsh

Vote Opt-Out: false

Events leading to the ban

As a cap gave AA to some guy who have asked for it, I also referred to everyone on announcement console as ‘chat’.
P.S Also I want to apologize for freaking out in admin PM two days ago, I just was frustrated that I got killed by that raider or whoever it was, dude just have killed me (and other several ppl) without explanation or reason and no one seemed to respond in PM.

Reason the ban should be removed

So everyone would continue to get AA should they ask

Alternate Accounts

Processing with trialmin

The processing trialmin has decided to close this appeal with the following message:

Because you clearly intend to do the same thing at got you role banned in first place i will be denying this appeal

To enable speedy review of all appeals, appeals that meet certain requirements may bypass the standard, often lengthy, review process. Our banning policy requires appeals which are denied using the speedy review process have this notice placed on them. Any of the following criteria typically make an appeal eligible for the speedy review process:

  • the ban is temporary and the player indicated on the appeal that they are ok with it being processed without a vote,
  • the ban length is less than or equal to 14 days,
  • the appeal is older than 7 days, or
  • the result of the appeal is obvious.

You may make a staff complaint if you believe this appeal was handled improperly, but should be aware that this will typically only result in a review of the processing of the appeal itself, with the appeal being re-opened if an issue is found. An appeal is considered to have been processed improperly if the criteria to use the speedy review process was not met, or if the facts which the processing admin relied on to process the appeal were incorrect. You must concisely describe why you believe the appeal was handled improperly. If no issue is found with the processing of the appeal, the appeal itself will not be re-reviewed. If, in bad faith, you claim that an appeal was handled improperly, the reviewing head admin may decide to extend the time you must wait before you appeal and/or extend your ban duration.

Added appeal-rejected and removed appeal-pending

This topic was automatically closed 3 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.