Ban reason:The ban reason is: "character name Steve hugh Mungis. previous ban for inappropriate character names." Length of ban:Indefinite Ban Issue: i do not know why i was banned
Vote Opt-Out:false
Events leading to the ban
i mean the ban speaks for itself. this has been this characters name since i started playing this game from 0 hours to 650 hours… i dont see the issue with it now.
Reason the ban should be removed
i dont agree with the ban what so ever. whats so wrong with this name that someone couldnt have said something 650 hours ago? i also dont agree with the other ban i have of character names because the word someone thought was inappropriate was “pole”, john “pole” was the banned name, that is a name that someone has IN REAL LIFE. and anyone who looks at my two character names and thinks there is anything inappropriate about them they should question why they think that way.
The ban is lifted, however the name remains inappropriate. An oversight by admins to fail to notice that a name is inappropriate is not an excuse to continue doing so. Considering the circumstances however an indefinite ban is too harsh. You may continue playing on the condition that you change your character’s name to not be a reference/world play.
To enable speedy review of all appeals, appeals that meet certain requirements may bypass the standard, often lengthy, review process. Our banning policy requires appeals which are denied using the speedy review process have this notice placed on them. Any of the following criteria typically make an appeal eligible for the speedy review process:
the ban is temporary and the player indicated on the appeal that they are ok with it being processed without a vote,
the ban length is less than or equal to 14 days,
the appeal is older than 7 days, or
the result of the appeal is obvious.
You may make a staff complaint if you believe this appeal was handled improperly, but should be aware that this will typically only result in a review of the processing of the appeal itself, with the appeal being re-opened if an issue is found. An appeal is considered to have been processed improperly if the criteria to use the speedy review process was not met, or if the facts which the processing admin relied on to process the appeal were incorrect. You must concisely describe why you believe the appeal was handled improperly. If no issue is found with the processing of the appeal, the appeal itself will not be re-reviewed. If, in bad faith, you claim that an appeal was handled improperly, the reviewing head admin may decide to extend the time you must wait before you appeal and/or extend your ban duration.