Ban reason:Connect denied: You, or another user of this computer or connection, are banned from playing here. The ban reason is: argumentative in ahelp, take a break." Length of ban:a day Ban Issue: What I was banned for is not against the rules
Vote Opt-Out:false
Events leading to the ban
I worked with another botanist to make killer tomatoes in an LRP server.
Last I checked, LRP meant LRP (Low RP) = Roleplay is not expected. MRP (Medium RP) = Roleplay is encouraged, but not expected (at least not all the time) HRP (High RP) = Roleplay is expected.
So why am I being held to standard nobody else is? I don’t know botany at all really. How am I supposed to know tomatoes make admins salty? What the fuck kinda fascist shit is this? Can’t even get a warning first because I didn’t immediately suck his cock? Dude needs to get over himself.
Reason the ban should be removed
Because it’s a first fucking offense. Your admin is just a salty bitch.
Additionally your ban has been upgraded to indefinite for abuse towards staff.
An LRP ruleset is not a free license to create armies of killer tomatoes, or otherwise self antag. Nor does it allow you to be combative to the handling admin which is the reason for your ban.
The decision to deny this appeal and upgrade your ban is based on the contents of this appeal which are unacceptable and against our community guidelines.
To enable speedy review of all appeals, appeals that meet certain requirements may bypass the standard, often lengthy, review process. Our banning policy requires appeals which are denied using the speedy review process have this notice placed on them. Any of the following criteria typically make an appeal eligible for the speedy review process:
the ban is temporary and the player indicated on the appeal that they are ok with it being processed without a vote,
the ban length is less than or equal to 14 days,
the appeal is older than 7 days, or
the result of the appeal is obvious.
You may make a staff complaint if you believe this appeal was handled improperly, but should be aware that this will typically only result in a review of the processing of the appeal itself, with the appeal being re-opened if an issue is found. An appeal is considered to have been processed improperly if the criteria to use the speedy review process was not met, or if the facts which the processing admin relied on to process the appeal were incorrect. You must concisely describe why you believe the appeal was handled improperly. If no issue is found with the processing of the appeal, the appeal itself will not be re-reviewed. If, in bad faith, you claim that an appeal was handled improperly, the reviewing head admin may decide to extend the time you must wait before you appeal and/or extend your ban duration.