Sandvich_enjoyer banned for being a friendly cerb after being told not to attack by chaplin then complaining about ahelp in LOOC

Ban reason: [Talking about ahelp in looc. being friendly as cerb]

Length of ban:  [1,440 minutes]

Events leading to the ban: [i was a cerb, i was told by my Chaplin to not attack, around 15 minutes later i was bwoinked about not attacking, i let the people around me know to hold on, i was in an ahelp, i complained in looc about the ahelp and how its not a big deal, the admin wanted a full list of the people who where friendly to me. i did not have a list of them. i informed the admin i was told not to attack by my chaplin, i was promptly banned]

Reason the ban should be removed: [i believe this ban is unjust, i was given no warning, and its not even my fault, i had to obey my chaplain, else thats another issue]

If you don’t mind I’ll be editing your message to put the format in the right place.

thank you


I have discussed this matter with some other admins. The ban will be lifted.

To enable speedy review of all appeals, appeals that meet certain requirements may bypass the standard, often lengthy, review process. Our banning policy requires appeals which are denied using the speedy review process have this notice placed on them. Any of the following criteria typically make an appeal eligible for the speedy review process:

  • the ban length is less than or equal to 14 days,
  • the appeal is older than 7 days, or
  • the result of the appeal is obvious.

In some cases, the banning admin may process the appeal. The banning admin cannot process the appeal if:

  • the facts that led to the ban are disputed,
  • the appeal makes a claim that the admin who placed it was biased, or
  • the ban was not within the ban guidelines.

You may contact a head game admin if you believe this appeal was handled improperly, but should be aware that this will typically only result in a review of the processing of the appeal itself, with the appeal being re-opened if an issue is found. An appeal is considered to have been processed improperly if the criteria to use the speedy review process was not met, or if the facts which the processing admin relied on to process the appeal were incorrect. You must concisely describe why you believe the appeal was handled improperly. If no issue is found with the processing of the appeal, the appeal itself will not be re-reviewed. If, in bad faith, you claim that an appeal was handled improperly, the reviewing head admin may decide to extend the time you must wait before you appeal and/or extend your ban duration. You can find a full list of staff, including head game admins at the staff directory.

From Accepted to Ban Appeals