Ban reason: [In a previous round, you used the term “Retard”. You have been warned for this exact issue previously. We consider it to be a slur, and using slurs is against the rules]
Length of ban: [January 22 7:45 8640 mins.]
Events leading to the ban: [2 weeks ago i called HOP r word for stopping the consented fight with non lethal shotgun shells, then i got a ahelp for saying it, i said that i was very sorry because i wasn’t intended to be in this way, but after 3 days i by accident do it again in a same type of situation i used it and immedetly spotted my mistake and ahelped about it, the admin told me its was bad but because i self reported myself. In my memory this was the last time when i did all someone the r word and did not done something about it]
Reason the ban should be removed: [I didn’t/I do not remember to call someone the r word, because in my last round as the ban states, i was playing CE in 1hour 30 shift on the 15 of January about 22:00 on Wizard Den Lizard, where nothing much happened. I am asking for an appeal]
i wasn’t banned after i self reported* sorry
I can see several instances of you using the slur post the 2 warning dates, I’ve reviewed the logs and the ban is justified within the banning policy.
I highly suggest you do not continue to use slurs as you will be indefinitely banned on the next instance.
Appeal denied.
To enable speedy review of all appeals, appeals that meet certain requirements may bypass the standard, often lengthy, review process. Our banning policy requires appeals which are denied using the speedy review process have this notice placed on them. Any of the following criteria typically make an appeal eligible for the speedy review process:
- the ban length is less than or equal to 14 days,
- the appeal is older than 7 days, or
- the result of the appeal is obvious.
In some cases, the banning admin may process the appeal. The banning admin cannot process the appeal if:
- the facts that led to the ban are disputed,
- the appeal makes a claim that the admin who placed it was biased, or
- the ban was not within the ban guidelines.
You may contact a head game admin if you believe this appeal was handled improperly, but should be aware that this will typically only result in a review of the processing of the appeal itself, with the appeal being re-opened if an issue is found. An appeal is considered to have been processed improperly if the criteria to use the speedy review process was not met, or if the facts which the processing admin relied on to process the appeal were incorrect. You must concisely describe why you believe the appeal was handled improperly. If no issue is found with the processing of the appeal, the appeal itself will not be re-reviewed. If, in bad faith, you claim that an appeal was handled improperly, the reviewing head admin may decide to extend the time you must wait before you appeal and/or extend your ban duration. You can find a full list of staff, including head game admins at the staff directory.
From Rejected to Ban Appeals