Spacecomputer - "[Grasshopper 68159] Racial slur; "NIGA"" This ban will only be removed via appeal

Username: spacecomputer

Ban reason: "[Grasshopper 68159] Racial slur; "NIGA"" This ban will only be removed via appeal.
Length of ban: Indefinite
Ban Issue:
The ban is fair, but I would like a second chance or reduction

Vote Opt-Out: false

Events leading to the ban

i was stunned by a ninja in bridge as a sec off and panicked to say on the radio “NINJA” but i misspelled it and only realized after what i said it. I do have dyslexia (quite minor only with complex spellings) so that most likely played a factor into it as well.

Reason the ban should be removed

i did not realise what i writen out before sending it. i do understand that what i send is very bad and agree with why i was banned but do it being accidental. i hope for it to be removed or reduced to a non-permanent ban

Alternate Accounts spacecomputer - “[Grasshopper 68159] Racial slur; “NIGA”” This ban will only be removed via appeal.

Processing with trialmin

This appeal has been accepted.

To enable speedy review of all appeals, appeals that meet certain requirements may bypass the standard, often lengthy, review process. Our banning policy requires appeals which are denied using the speedy review process have this notice placed on them. Any of the following criteria typically make an appeal eligible for the speedy review process:

  • the ban is temporary and the player indicated on the appeal that they are ok with it being processed without a vote,
  • the ban length is less than or equal to 14 days,
  • the appeal is older than 7 days, or
  • the result of the appeal is obvious.

You may make a staff complaint if you believe this appeal was handled improperly, but should be aware that this will typically only result in a review of the processing of the appeal itself, with the appeal being re-opened if an issue is found. An appeal is considered to have been processed improperly if the criteria to use the speedy review process was not met, or if the facts which the processing admin relied on to process the appeal were incorrect. You must concisely describe why you believe the appeal was handled improperly. If no issue is found with the processing of the appeal, the appeal itself will not be re-reviewed. If, in bad faith, you claim that an appeal was handled improperly, the reviewing head admin may decide to extend the time you must wait before you appeal and/or extend your ban duration.

Added appeal-accepted and removed appeal-pending

This topic was automatically closed 3 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.